monday1313 Posted March 11, 2010 Report Posted March 11, 2010 this sounds like it could be a benefit to future EIAS versions... Quote
Ian Posted March 11, 2010 Report Posted March 11, 2010 These technologies are only useful in 'certain' situations, but rest assured, we are working very, VERY hard to modernise the EIAS infrastructure :) Quote
KurtF Posted March 11, 2010 Report Posted March 11, 2010 Hello Ian, regarding the EIAS infrastructure, can you release any information, perhaps a road map, of anticipated growth and improvements? I already know the Igors have said 'no' to the idea of an integrated modeler. At this point I don't know if I'm willing to continue forward with EIAS and am in need of some reassurances. Thanks. Quote
Tomas Egger Posted March 12, 2010 Report Posted March 12, 2010 Hey Kurt, I like the idea of a integrated modeler.. but we have lots of steps first, like you wrote: “EIAS infrastructure†so, right now like Igors said, its not the moment to have it. Thanksss Tom Quote
Igors Posted March 12, 2010 Report Posted March 12, 2010 Hi All this sounds like it could be a benefit to future EIAS versions... It looks really interested. But let's activate a common sense: why, say, V-Ray, Turtle and others RT render leaders do not promise real-time RT tomorrow? :rolleyes: Apparently because this technique has some limitations as Ian wrote. It's absolute normal and it does not mean the technique is bad. So what are those limitations? How are they suitable for us? It would be helpful to know. "Just real-time" says nothing yet, it's only a beautiful dream. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.