Jump to content

JoeV

Members
  • Posts

    36
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by JoeV

  1. BTW, another software package that uses EVE as their dongle needed a swap to a 64 bit version. Is this a related issue?

    Info from the web:

    Rainbow Eve3 Dongles: Exchange Needed for 64-bit Cocoa LightWave

    LightWave 3D v9.6.1 brings both 32-bit and 64-bit Mac support to LightWave users for the first time. One of the issues that users will need to be aware of is that only the Sentinel framework is provided for 64-bit operation, because SafeNet does not have plans to port the Eve3 Framework, which is required for the Mac-only Eve3 USB Dongles. If you have an Eve3 USB dongle and you plan to use the 64-bit version of v9.6.1, you will need to exchange it for the current Sentinel Ultrapro Dongle. This same issue will also affect LightWave CORE if you are planning to upgrade - CORE will use only the Sentinel driver for both the 32-bit and 64-bit Mac versions.

    You can determine if you have an Eve3 dongle by checking the engraved logo on the top, where it will say Rainbow/Eve3.

  2. I'll try starting up in 32 bit mode and see if that's the issue, but it will have to wait until I'm at that computer later today. Thanks for the suggestions!

    The original startup disk is online. I could pull that one out --.

    The SSD is installed in the bay under the optical drive.

    I'll also try starting up from the original HD and see if EI launches (I'll also check to see if that drive is at 32 or 64)

  3. Got a new Mac Pro, 6-Core Xeon, 12 GB RAM. I installed EI8 without any issues at all. Then I added a SSD, cloned the startup drive to the SSD and now I use the SSD for my startup and application drive. EI8 will not launch, I get: Hardware key error: Key not plugged in #3. But the key is plugged in. I ran the EI8 installer again along with the dongle installation as well.

    Might I need to remove the original startup disk drive? Is EI confused by the two systems?

  4. Here there are a couple of analyses of the new towers. They are a bit preliminary, but fairly revealing.

    http://macperformanceguide.com/Reviews-MacProWestmere.html

    (a fairly long one, rather Photoshop and friends-oriented but quite interesting)

    http://www.barefeats.com/wst10.html

    (www.barefeats.com has several tests of the new Radeons, too)

    Midrange, the hexacore Westmere seems quite balanced and overall better than an octocore, but one wonders if EIAS would be one of the few apps that would get better results with an octocore. As per the first review, it seems the new range of Macs makes all too easy to get it wrong and buy a not quite cost-effective model: one has to match app usage with Mac model more carefully than usual.

    At my job we'll probably get a hexacore to replace our old G5 tower (we do a bit of everything on it: DTP, DTV, 3D, radio ads, etc.). We'll get some OWC-brand SSDs for the OS and apps' temp files, too.

    I have the same G5 as Aziz and anything I get will be a vast improvement. I reviewed the specs from the sites you listed and it does seem that the 6 core smokes the 8 core. The 6 core is what I am leaning toward, but I don't want to get it and then regret not getting the 8 cores. I guess I find it hard to believe that even after all these years, software doesn't really take full advantage of multiple cores. Since I also use the Adobe suite in addition to 3D software, it makes sense to go 6 cores. And I can still set up a Camera for each core correct?

×
×
  • Create New...